Is SARS-CoV-II a Biological Weapon? From Conspiracy Theory to Geopolitical Realism

Source: VERITY BASE af Ole Dupont

Several theories about the origin of CoVid-19 have emerged in the media, most recently the retelling of the alleged leak story, from the WuHan laboratory and the mystery of the fabled bat.

The pro-American speculations and theories came to life on January 26, with the Washington Times article by Bill Gertz entitled; “Coronavirus may originate in laboratory linked to China’s bioweapons program”, suggesting that the virus outbreak could be linked to the Wuhan Institute for Virology. A few days later, Dr. Francis Boyle claims that the coronavirus is a biological weapon, and that the virus is genetically modified with ‘gain-of-function’, and possibly leaked from a Level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory in Wuhan.

Other theories began to emerge on February 27, with an interview on the Arabic-language channel Russia Today (RT), in which Russian biologist and former UN expert Igor Nikulin states: ‘Coronavirus is a biological weapon, perhaps a ‘product’ of an American bioweapon project from 1999′. On February 29, Global Research publishes an article describing a delegation of US soldiers attending the Wuhan 2019 Military Games, maybe could be the carrier of the coronavirus. The first CoVid-19 cases where detected approx. two weeks later in Wuhan.

Larry Romanoff refers to a possible ‘leak’ from a BSL-4 lab at Fort Detrick, and questions the surprising number of respiratory disease outbreaks in the United States in 2019. Including e-cigarette related illness, with CoVid-19 similar symptoms, as well as the many and early influenza admissions and deaths in US, 2019.

On March 11, CDC Director Robert Redfield stated that some coronavirus related deaths had been found posthumously. It may be breaking the Wuhan timeline and CoVid-19 may have flourished in the United States before the first cases were discovered in Wuhan.

This got the Chinese spokesman Lijian Zhao to the keys, where he wrote on twitter; The CDC was caught on the spot. When did patient zero appear in the United States? How many people are infected? What are the hospitals called? It may be the U.S. Army that brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Publish your data! The United States owes us an explanation!

The US response could subsequently be read in the lawsuit filed by the Dallas federal court accusing the Chinese government of developing coronavirus as a “biological weapon.” The war of words was further escalated when Trump stated that the United States was investigating whether the virus came from a Wuhan laboratory.

Most recently, Trump has contradicted his own sources of intelligence by claiming that he has seen evidence that coronavirus originated from a Chinese laboratory. Secretary of State Mike (we Lie, we Cheat, we Steal) Pompeo followed with the statement: “Huge evidence” shows that the Covid-19 outbreak began in a laboratory in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, without providing any evidence to support his claims.

Less reassuring when US top officials in the Trump administration, while at the same time being accused of pushing the US intelligence services for a “proof” that can link the virus to the Chinese lab. A ‘media narrative’ from the Pentagon very similar to earlier ‘evidence’ of alleged weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which later turned out to be false, incorrect or to say the least, misleading.

Where does SARS-CoV-2 come from?

Larry Romanoff: “As Daniel R. Lucey previously noted, MERS was initially believed to come from a Saudi Arabian patient in June 2012, but was later traced back to a hospital in Jordan. The “official narrative” about SARS, MERS and ZIKA, has since been proven to be wrong, which should give rise to caution and reflection in the study of the origin of SARS-CoV-II.”

A study from the Wuhan Institute of Cell Therapy of 2019-nCoV genomics indicated that it was a recombinant virus of SARS-CoV and HIV origin. The two virus species had distinct and different pedigrees, and because of differences in time and space for their existence, their recombinant would never have appeared in a natural setting. Therefore the 2019 nCoV cannot be a product of nature, but rather a product of human genetic engineering.

The hunt for the first strain of coronavirus

In February 2020, a research team at the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden and the Chinese Academy of Sciences published an analysis of 93 SARS-CoV-II virus samples from 12 countries.

The study of the genomic data suggested that the virus may have entered the market from outside, and thus also that the virus may not originate in the Wuhan market. The researchers also said that direct infection between people was possibly beginning in late November 2019. The study pointed out that the market may have boosted circulation, rather than being the source of the virus.

Based on this data, the Japanese media agency Ashi TV reported in February that the virus did not originate from China but from the United States. On February 27, a Taiwanese virologist in a television program presented a chain of evidence based on a mapping of the SARS-CoV-II haplotypes.

Coronavirus may not originate in Wuhan’s fish market

On April 9, a research team from Cambridge University and Germany published a study that reconstructed the early “evolutionary paths” of CoViD-19.

Although it would be a misinterpretation of the research to suggest that the new coronavirus originated outside of China – the study still suggests – that the new coronavirus type A is the root cause of the virus outbreak and that type A exists in the United States and Australia. The virus found in Wuhan belongs to the type B, derived from the type A mutation.

Peter Forster – No evidence that COVID-19 originated from Wuhan.

Security failures in US and Chinese bio-labs give rise to Covid-19 theories and speculations

“SARS virus has escaped from secured containment facilities in Beijing several times,” notes Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. WHO: Beijing laboratory blamed for SARS outbreak – March 26, 2004”

Earlier leaks of SARS in 2004 from the Chinese Institute of Virology in Beijing have contributed to speculations that CoVid-19, may have leaked from a Wuhan laboratory. No information is available on whether the 2003, SARS epidemic was caused by a leak from a laboratory in Beijing. But questions have been raised as to whether SARS may have been a biological weapon by Nikolai Filatov in 2003.

However, it is certain that the SARS cases in March 2004 were caused by a leak from a laboratory, at the Chinese Institute of Virology in Beijing. Two laboratory staffs were infected with SARS, causing a minor outbreak. In May 2004, the WHO declared that the infection was contained.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is known for animal experiments and for experimenting with bats in the area from the source of CoViD-19 and that this was done with the involvement of the Pentagon’s military laboratories and US fundings. This raises further speculation that SARS-COV-II – is produced in a laboratory and that the Huanan Seafood market is not the original source of the outbreak.

SARS and Coronavirus Gain-of-Function research -to create a hybrid virus capable of infecting human cells

Nature Medicine announced in November 2015, that it had successful research on whether a bat coronavirus could be made to infect human HeLa cells.

Nature Medicine: SARS-like cluster of circulating bats coronavirus shows potential for human emergence.

The team behind engineered a hybrid virus, that combined a bat coronavirus with a SARS virus, adapted to grow in mice and mimic human disease. A hybrid virus that was able to infect human cells.

The project was funded by USAID (CIA) and performed at the Department of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at a BSL-3 laboratory, with bio-material provided by the military laboratory at Fort Detrick.

Nature News: Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research.

The United States funded gain-of-function research in bats at Wuhan laboratory

Institute of Virology in Wuhan, conducted coronavirus experiments on bats caught in caves more than 1,000 miles away in Yunnan. The research was funded by the United States: USAID (EPT) PREDICT, Hundred Talents, “One-Three-Five” Strategic Program and the National Health Institutes (NIH) with $3.7 million, which continues to license the Virology Institute in Wuhan, to fund experiments.

The research team of the Virological Institute of Wuhan announced in November 2017, in a scientific study; that the coronavirus found in horseshoe bats in a cave in Yunnan – contains all genomes of the SARS virus and assumed – that the direct ancestor of the human virus originated from this cave.

Project G-2101: Pentagon biolab detected MERS and SARS similar coronavirus in bats

Arms Watch: EcoHealth Alliance US State Entrepreneur who studied coronavirus at the Wuhan laboratory in China received $6.5 million dollars from the Pentagon in 2017 to collect 5,000 bats and study coronavirus at the Lugar Center in Georgia and West Asia.

Wuhan Institute of Virology and Center for Disease Control

CCDC manages laboratories throughout China, including the biosafety level 2 – the plant in the Wuhan Center for Disease Control – located approx. 280 meters from the seafood market (sometimes confused with the nearby Wuhan Institute of Virology). The laboratory specializes in the identification and collection of pathogens and host animals for research purposes. They are researching SARS-like coronavirus originating from bats.

Wuhan Institute of Virology is located 15 km from the Huanan Seafood Market. The lab is known to have reported that; the Chinese horseshoe bats were natural reservoirs for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) that caused the pandemic in 2002/03.

International cooperation and diplomatic bio-couriers

There has been speculation about Chinese and American agents, viral theft, covid-19 and transportation of biological materials, based on US lawsuits in July 2019 with Xiangguo Qiu and Keding Cheng, and again in January 2020 with Dr. Charles Lieber, Yanqing Ye and Zaosong Zheng.

Harvard professor Dr. Charles Lieber made headlines in January 2020 when he was arrested on allegations of creating and reselling the new coronavirus to China. That was not the case, as Lieber was among three people accused of lying about ties to the Chinese government. Lieber lied about his commitment to the Thousand Talents Program (Hundred Talents?) and his affiliation with WUT.

What still remains is the big question, about all the arrests and the exact nature of all the bio transports and research programs, they have conducted in collaboration with both Chinese and American scientists.

The laboratories at the Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Center for Disease Control are the subject of much publicity, all while Fort Detrick an American Military bio-laboratory – which in the shadow of its past CIA operations, development and deployment of biological weapons, seems to get zero to none – attention in the Western media.

Fort Detrick and the US Bioweapons Programs and Laboratories

Closure of the laboratories at Fort Detrick, fueled further speculation as to whether a physical leak from the lab or the staff again had brought virus transmission out into society. Either due to sloppy security procedures or as a deliberate bio-attack, as it happened in the US during the 2001 anthrax attacks.

“According to author Stephen Kinzer, the CIA project MK-ULTRA was a continuation of the work that began in Japanese facilities and Nazi concentration camps during World War II – to suppress and control human minds”. Kinzer presents evidence of the continuation of a Nazi agenda, citing the CIA’s secret recruitment of Nazi torturers and vivisectionists to continue experimenting with thousands of individuals. The Nazis were brought to Fort Detrick, Maryland, to instruct CIA officers – about the deadly use of sarin gas.”

Fort Detrick has its roots in a small municipal airport established in Frederick, Maryland, in 1929. From 1943, Fort Detrick was the center of the American Biological Weapons Program (USBWL) until its termination in 1969.

The biological weapons program was a collection of research laboratories and pilot plants operating in Camp (later Fort) Detrick, Maryland, USA. The military fort has a long and eventful history, which was founded with the origin of projects such as Operation Paperclip, Project MK-ULTRA and ARTICHOKE.

“The Scientific Director at Fort Detrick said; an alternative being considered was to inject Cuban troops with deadly botulinum toxin, arguing that this would be “a good thing” as it would save American lives in an invasion.

The Fort Detrick director argued that there was a “humane aspect” to the plan because it would reduce the number of casualties from the fighting. This “humane” American biological warfare would “only” kill 1 to 2 percent of the Cuban population. Given the island’s population of about 7 million at the time, that means the Pentagon was planning to kill between 70,000 and 140,000 Cuban civilians.”

From biowarfare to biological defense programs

At the US Military Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) based at Fort Detrick, at the United States Biological Defense Programs and other leading BSL-3 and BSL-4 laboratories, some of the world’s most dangerous pathogens are still being researched today. Including Ebola virus, Smallpox virus, Marburg virus, Anthrax, Botulism, Magnaporthe grisea, Brucellosis, Q fever, Bird flu, Pest, Ricin, Yellow fever and others.

Fort Detrick built new BSL-3 and BSL-4 laboratories in 2006/9 ($143 million), which includes a 160,000 sqm new facility inside Fort Detrick. Approx 40,000 sqm. for bio safety level-3 laboratories and 10,000 sqm. for dedicated level-4 laboratories.

BSL-3 and BSL-4 Laboratories at Fort Detrick closed several times – due to spillage and non-compliance with safety procedures

The lab received bad publicity, when the FBI accused one of the scientists of committing the anthrax bioterrorism attack in 2001, sending deadly anthrax spores by mail that killed five, infected fifteen and sent thousands on antibiotics.

Recently, it raised concern when CDC In the summer of 2019, issued a warning and then temporarily closed the biosecurity levels 3 and 4 laboratories at Fort Detrick for three months. Today military scientists at Fort Detrick are back at overtime ‘to grow’ new batches of COVID-19 – to find a vaccine against coronavirus.

Timeline for accidents, injuries and leaks from Fort Detrick’s bio-laboratories

1992: Maryland investigated Fort Detrick for possible hazardous waste handling violations when personnel blew up old chemicals with grenades.

1995: Leak in sewage plant at Fort Detrick raises questions – a test company discovered a leak in a brazed joint in a 12-inch wide pipe, about 100 feet from a steam sterilization plant, where wastewater from 50 laboratories at the Fort Detrick base is treated.

2001: The first letter containing anthrax is sent on September 18. Several letters with anthrax spores are sent to several news media and Democratic senators in 2001. The FBI’s main suspect in the case, Bruce Ivins was a senior biological weapons researcher at Fort Detrick. He committed suicide in 2008, shortly before the FBI planned to charge him with the attacks.

2002: Poor enforcement of safety rules allowed anthrax spores to escape, from the Military Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases – at Fort Detrick in April 2002. According to a US military report, (see GSN, July 21).

2004: FBI anthrax investigation close the Fort Detrick laboratories. “The US Army High Security Laboratories in Fort Detrick, Maryland have been closed – as part of the nearly 3-year investigation of the anthrax mail attacks in 2001″.

2009: Fort Detrick suspends research after Pentagon finds problems in tracking pathogens. USAMRIID had concerns about whether the facility had an accurate inventory of all deadly “selected funds” in its cabinets and refrigerators.

2018: Heavy rain causes flooding at Fort Detrick. Operations at Fort Detrick’s BSL-3 and BSL-4 laboratories are shut down due to flooding and leakage in hazardous waste storage tanks. Workers discovered flooding in the facility on May 17, and on May 25, a leak was discovered in a storage tank outside the plant’s concrete containment wall. USAMRIID temporarily halted activities at the BSL-3 and BSL-4 laboratories as water from the SSP could have been released to the site around the SSP building.

2019: Frederick News-Post reports that BSL-3 and BSL-4 laboratories at Fort Detrick are suspended and shut down. Two breaches reported by USAMRIID to the CDC identified problems with the wastewater treatment system that did not meet established standards as well as problems with the periodic recertification of staff and its ability to “implement and maintain containment procedures” used in operations at biosafety level 3 and 4 laboratories.

Share. Carol Krimm (D-Frederick) Krimm wants to review the shutdown due to security breaches under the 2010 recommendations. While USAMRIID notified local officials after the closure, Krimm questioned why they were not warned earlier, including when the CDC came to inspect the facility. USAMRIID and local officials should review the situation and compare with the recommendations to make sure everything was followed.

“But something went wrong here, and I still don’t know what went wrong. But something did because the CDC closed the labs. Something went wrong. So I think there’s a need for more transparency, and I think when we has to do with the public, the more information, the better. “

In a March 15 article, the Global Times urged the US authorities to provide information about the closure of Fort Detrick, Maryland. The Global Times argued that “timely information to the public would benefit global unity and cooperation against the pandemic”.

Supreme Court will not hear Fort Detrick Death-lawsuit

In 2015, 106 plaintiffs filed suit against the United States; that the government withheld information from people who lived and worked near Fort Detrick and “carelessly and negligently” handled toxic chemicals, causing personal injury and deaths from exposure.

“From the 1950s to the 1970s, Fort Detrick military personnel disposed hazardous waste from its biological weapons research and chemical programs, in a location adjacent to the residential neighborhoods. The government and the army have consistently denied the wrongdoing. The courts agreed with the government and the army’s motion to dismiss the case.”

The locals around US Bio-laboratories are Getting Sick

Not long ago, the Russian Ministry of Defense accused American scientists at the Georgian Medical Center in Lugar, of suspicion of conducting human trials. The military released evidence that under the pretext of a “treatment center”, the United States had set up a secret biological weapons laboratory in Georgia, near the Russian borders. Experiments that allegedly have already killed 73 people.

Former Secretary of State for Georgia Igor Giorgadze published data on 30 people who died in December 2015, while undergoing treatment in the hepatitis C laboratory, as well as 30 and 13 people, who died in April and August 2016. The causes of deaths were listed as “unknown” and an investigation was not conducted.

Arms Watch – The Pentagon Bio-weapons

At a press conference in Moscow on September 11, 2018, Giorgadze announced that he had received documents from friends in Georgia, that the “preliminary investigations” showed that in a laboratory near Tbilisi “could conduct secret experiments on residents of Georgia”.

On September 15, 2018, Igor Giorgadze stated in an interview with RT, that he asked the US authorities to investigate the legality of the work being done in the US laboratory near Tbilisi. He published earlier articles that could indicate that the United States was experimenting on humans and testing bacteriological weapons at the Lugar Center, which opened in 2011.

Surprising US outbreak of respiratory diseases in 2019

A surprising outbreak of strange respiratory disease in 2019, with e-cigarette-associated pneumonia and an influenza season, that was tougher than usual and started early, raised questions back in February.

Outbreak of e-cigarette associated pneumonia

Vapor or e-cigarette-induced respiratory syndrome has only occurred in the United States, said John Britton in October 2019. In European countries such as in France, there is no evidence of an outbreak of the steamer-associated lung disease, that occurred in the United States.

The outbreak of vapor-related respiratory disease is thought to originate from e-cigarettes with cannabis, where vaping was suspected to be the source of the disease outbreak. However, people who did not smoke also became ill and therefore the ‘viral-bacterial nature’ was not excluded.

Washington Post: “You have a lot of otherwise healthy young people who suddenly arrive with rapidly developing pneumonia to the emergency departments – it raises red flags in a hurry,” said Sean Callahan, a doctor at the University of Utah. “This is new.”

The first deaths from vaping related pulmonary fibrosis were reported in August 2019 in Illinois, USA. At the time, federal and state officials investigated nearly 200 cases of surprising disease outbreaks in 22 states, according to the CDC. Data from the CDC in February 2020, shows that there were more than 2,807 cases reported from 50 states, the District of Columbia and the US territories (Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands) associated with vaping or e-cigarettes.

New York Times: The most sick patients have suffered extensive lung damage, requiring oxygen therapy and several days of ventilation. Some are expected to have permanent lung damage. More information is needed to know what causes these diseases, “said Ileana Arias, CDC.

Symptoms according to CDC: Patients typically experienced cough, chest pain or shortness of breath before their health deteriorated to a point where they needed to be admitted. Other symptoms were: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and fever. Many have ended up with acute respiratory syndrome, a life-threatening condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs and prevents oxygen from circulating in the bloodstream.

Early and Tough American 2019 Flu Season

Speculation arose again when CDC Director Robert Redfield, during a March 2020 hearing, said; that some coronavirus related deaths – have been found posthumously in the 2019 flu season.

CDC Director Robert Redfield answered Harley Rouda’s questions in the House Supervisory Committee, where Rouda asked; “So we could have some people in the United States dying from – what may look like a flu, but actually can be a coronavirus?” Redfield responded that “some cases have been diagnosed in that way in the United States today.”

To say the least, it set the media on fire.. focus was back on the surprising outbreak of respiratory illness, in the period surrounding the closure of Fort Detrick and the questions that have been asked, about making the data on posthumous flu cases in the 2019 season public and transparent.

This is also the centerpiece of the questions posed by Chinese spokesman Lijian Zhao when he wrote on twitter; “The CDC was caught on the spot. When did patient zero appear in the United States? How many people are infected? What are the hospitals called? It may be the U.S. Army that brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Publish data! The US owes us an explanation! ”

US Influenza Season 2019/20

On July 11, 2019, there was a strange outbreak of respiratory virus at a Virginia nursing home that left two people dead and 18 hospitalized. At Fairfax County Health Department, 54 people are reported to have symptoms of respiratory illness, in the outbreak at Greenspring Retirement Community in Springfield, Frederics Montgomery County.

“The New England Patriots, in November, were sent to their knees by ‘flu-like symptoms’. Devin McCourty told WPRI he hasn’t seen anything like it in his 10 years with the Patriots. “We had people come in and when you looked in their eyes you could just see that they were completely out of it”. Mike Reiss reported that a player was seen wearing a mask in the locker room.”

One hospital had 9 flu cases at this time last year, this year it had more than 1,400. At Ochsner Health System in Louisiana, there were 6,909 cases of influenza in November – that’s 1,385% more cases than November 2018. In fact, there have never been so many places with the highest level of flu activity in the last 10 flu seasons at this time of year .

In Maryland, in December, 14,000 people visited the emergency department due to flu-like illness. The CDC says there have been at least 2.6 million flu illness and 23,000 flu-related hospitalizations, according to the December analysis. The Maryland Department of Health had 24,865 confirmed cases of influenza per day. February 1, and more are hospitalized due to flu in 2019-2020 than the year before.

The CDC states in February that at least 14,000 people have died and 250,000 have already been hospitalized during the 2019-20 flu season. More than 26 million Americans have fallen ill with flu-like symptoms, according to the latest FluView report from February.

Allegations that SARS-CoV-II is a Bio Weapon

Biotechnology and gain-of-function research (also called activating mutations – that can alter a gene to make its effect stronger (enhanced activation) or replaced by another and more abnormal function). is the starting point for whether SARS-CoV-2 is created in a laboratory.

In December 2017, the U.S. government lifted a temporary ban implemented in 2014, that banned state funding of all new “gain-of-function” experiments, that can improve pathogens such as avian influenza, SARS and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome).

Yoshihiro Kawaoka & Ron Fouchier

“In 2010 and 2011, Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin, Madison and Ron Fouchier, Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, announced that they had succeeded in making the deadly avian H5N1 flu virus more transmissible ‘between ferrets‘.

Dr. Boyle states that Kawaoka is “the same death scientist who revived the Spanish flu virus for the Pentagon’s offensive weapons programs.

Critics point out that H5N1 can mutate and gain human-to-human transmission ability, creating a risk of triggering a pandemic. Marc Lipsitch, Harvard Epidemiologist: The experiments should never have been conducted. “Is research so compelling and so important to perform that it can justify the risk?” “The answer is no.” Kawaoka and Fouchier – and other respected scientists – obviously disagreed. “

Genetic Gain-of-Function modified virus

The accusations of whether ‘gain-of-function’ and a biological leak/accident or a direct biological attack, is behind the global pandemic – has been raised by people from several nations.

Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the United States ‘Biological Weapons Convention’ known as the ‘Biological Weapons Act‘ of 1989, states in February – that coronavirus is a biological weapon. Boyle believes the virus is genetically modified with ‘gain-of-function

Igor Nikulin Russian microbiologist and former U.N. expert on the United Nations Biological Weapons Commission states: It is possible that coronavirus is a targeted biological weapon, just like Ebola and the bird flu were. The US government may be testing a pathogenic agent, which it began developing in 1999.

There are a number of experts who note strange coincidences in the circumstances of new infections, and an artificial origin of covid-19 will not be ruled out. Until the year 2000, not one of these viruses “jumped” on humans.

They have lived side by side with us humans for millions of years, and have lived like parasites on other animals. For example, on camels, as is the case with the Middle East respiratory syndrome. Or on bats, birds and others, but these infections were not transmitted to humans. And now in 20 years – eight deadly viruses have already emerged. Explicitly excessive.

Professor Luc Montagnier, co-discoverer of the AIDS virus, states that the new coronavirus is the result of a laboratory accident and in an interview on French CNews he said that the properties of the new coronavirus could not have arisen naturally.

According to the Nobel Prize winner in medicine, the SARS-CoV-2 virus – is the result of an attempt to manufacture a vaccine against the AIDS virus, Agence France reported. Montagnier says the presence of HIV elements in the genome of the new virus and even elements of “germ malaria” is very suspicious, the report said.

George Webb om tilstedeværelse af HIV-elementer i SARS-CoV-II

Investigative Journalist, George Webb [youtube

Franz Klintsevich, Russian politician has stated that he was very careful about all conspiracy theories related to coronavirus. But in his opinion, however, most facts point to a laboratory in the United States. “The conclusions are obvious: it has been found that the virus is artificial and very likely to be associated with American soldiers,” said the politician.

Igor Giorgadze: COVID-19 is composed of three parts: Bats coronavirus, snake coronavirus and HIV component (human immunodeficiency virus). In nature, such a combination would not happen. This coronavirus was developed in the Military Biological Laboratories of the United States of America and this was published in the journal Nature in 2015.

Ayatollah Khomeini: “The establishment of a headquarter to combat the outbreak of COVID-19 is based on evidence – indicating the possibility of a biological attack, signaling the need for the emergency command to operate under one single headquarter”

Kevin Barrett: The Trump administration is waging total hybrid war against China and it is very likely that US state actors have triggered Covid-19 in both countries as part of that war. If so, they may not have expected the setback, Kevin Barrett said in an interview with the Balkan Post, adding,

“They may have thought that, like SARS, avian influenza and swine flu, among other former US biological attacks against China – that CoVid-19 would remain contained and do the most harm in the selected countries.”

Chinese epidemics in recent times and during the trade war with Washington

The 2013 outbreak in China of avian H7N9 virus, is considered a hostile attack. Beijing on that basis accuses Washington of using biological weapons in 2013. Earlier in 2003, Nikolai Filatov, Moscow’s Epidemiologic Services stated; that he thought the SARS virus was man-made.

Larry Romanoff: China was again and unexpectedly affected by epidemic outbreaks, especially during the period 2018/19 during the Beijing-Washington trade crisis. China experienced 6 pandemics during that period, respectively: avian influenza of the type H7N4 and H7N9 (two variations of avian influenza), outbreak of African swine flu, armyworms and a high pathogen of the avian influenza strain (virus A).

  • Feb 15, 2018: H7N4 bird flu. At least 1,600 people are affected in China and more than 600 lost their lives. Many chickens were killed. China has to buy American poultry products.
  • June, 2018: H7N9 bird flu. Many chickens killed. China has to buy American poultry products.
  • August 2018: Outbreak of African swine flu. Same virus strain as Russia from Georgia. Millions of pigs killed. China has to buy American pork products.
  • May 24, 2019: Massive attack of army worms in 14 provincial regions of China, destroying most food crops. Spread quickly to more than 8,500 acres of China’s grain production. China produces an astonishing number of eggs. China has to buy US agricultural products – corn, soybeans.
  • December, 2019: The Corona virus puts China’s economy on hold.
  • January, 2020: China is hit by a “highly pathogenic” strain of bird flu in Hunan Province. Many chickens died, many others killed. China has to buy American poultry products.

The standard saying is that accidents happen in three, not in six…

Concluding comments…

When information is gathered from multiple open sources, the anti-Chinese narrative with the China virus and the release from the Wuhan lab, is quickly set under severe pressure, while raising a number of questions to the US administration and leadership. Questions that have been asked before – repeatedly by different people and nations. To date ‘All Quiet on the Western Front’

What did US intelligence know about the ‘Chinese’ virus?

The United States had several months of intelligence information – which could have prevented thousands of deaths in the United States, under the Trump administration. The story that China has failed to provide information and is to blame for the world’s coronavirus problem – seems to be a ship in distress!

Article from the Strategic Culture Foundation by Pepe Escobar: What Did American Intelligence Really Know About the ‘Chinese’ Virus?

American Army Scientists have committed terrorist acts

The FBI suspected a employee from Fort Detrick, was behind the anthrax attacks in 2001. He allegedly committed ‘suicide’ before he was charged. But was he part of a larger group? and could it happen again?

Bio-laboratories is a global risk factor

Lethal virus and biological material have previously been leaked from both US and Chinese laboratories. In 2004, China had a leak of SARS from the Beijing laboratory, which was an accident – unrelated to the laboratory in Wuhan. The United States had a leak of anthrax spores in 2002 from Fort Detrick.

The many leaks and human errors at Fort Detrick’s laboratories, is only covered in a 30 year period in this document and everything can be found through publicly available information. But how many other cases have never reached the eye of the public? – And can we trust that the biological pollution caused by the various emissions, has not been harmful to people in the local environment?

Action against the United States for local disease outbreaks and adverse effects in the local areas of their biological military laboratories.

106 American plaintiffs had an unresolved case against Fort Detrick and the same issue is a reality for locals around the Pentagon Laboratory Lugar Center in Tbilisi, Georgia. People die and the bereaved are not heard. The Pentagon is silent, while accusing other nations of doing exactly, what they themselves are being accused off.

US finances and conduct Gain-of-function research with Bats, Coronavirus and SARS

The United States has funded several research programs [1] [2] [3] [4] with bats and gain-of-function research at the Virology Institute in Wuhan, the Lugar Center in Georgia, West Asia and at US laboratories such as Fort Detrick, Maryland and Chapel Hill in North Carolina. It shows a scientific exchange between Chinese and American BSL laboratories, with coronavirus (gain-of-function) experiments on bats and SARS etc.

The United States has funded animal experiments in Chinese laboratories, and obtained copies of new strains of Chinese bats coronavirus, then got them sent home with their diplomatic bio-couriers, for further processing at BSL facilities in the United States. It tells the story, that the US has used the Institute of Virology and the Center for Disease Control in Wuhan for animal experiments and obtained ‘isolated’ coronavirus genome strain(s) from the bats (rhinolophidae) for their own research on American soil.

It raises or revives questions about the origins of the SARS-CoV-II and of all the diplomatic bio-couriers and transports of biomaterial, the nations in between. Was SARS-CoV-II created – as they succeeded in infecting human HeLa cells, when they combined a bat coronavirus with a SARS virus in the laboratories at Chapel Hill, North Carolina and Fort Detrick, Maryland?

Epidemiological findings show that Wuhan is not the source of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, but has served as a catalyst for spreading through the fish market

Epidemiological findings and studies [1] [2] [3] from February have pointed to the fact that Wuhan or China is not the breeding ground or the source of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic but has, to a much greater extent, served as a catalyst for the spread through the fish market in Wuhan.

It was also found at the beginning of the outbreak that the genome sequence from Italy and Iran was different from the viral strain in China and thus SARS-CoV-2 entered Iran and Italy by other means than from China. In addition, the United States is the only country to possess all 5 strains of SARS-CoV and there is no ‘known viral ancestor’ of CoVid-19, suggesting that covid-19 did not develop from a Batman cave in Wuhan.

SARS-CoV-2 has elements of MERS and HIV and thus has not followed a natural evolutionary path of evolution

Genomics indicated that it was a recombinant virus of SARS-CoV and HIV origin. The possible presence of MERS and HIV elements in SARS-CoV-2 indicates that this virus has not followed a natural evolutionary pathway from a natural selection, but has probably been bred in a laboratory.

In principle, there is a lack of explanation for the evolutionary path of several hundred years, which is lacking in the development of the coronavirus, in the short timespan it has occured. CoVid-19 has elements from MERS and prior to the emergence of the 2019 nCoV, this function was not observed in the lineage of beta-coronavirus.

COVID-19 was manipulated and studied in a laboratory

Judy Mikovits – COVID-19 was manipulated and studied in a laboratory

WuHan 2019 Military World Games

Questions have been asked, as to whether CoVid-19 has been brought to WuHan, by the US Military who participated in the WuHan 2019 Military World Games with 172 athletes.

Several of the American team were ill and Luc Montagnier’s statements on malaria elements in CoViD-19, may be linked to the malaria symptoms of the five US military athletes admitted on Oct. 25 in Wuhan. It is worth noting, that malaria is not a widespread disease in either China or the United States.

The US team, despite having the world’s most expensive military by a factor of 10, finishes in a 35th place. It shows a top team that was plagued by illness and it has been reported that the team performed mediocre in the tournament, compared to what is expected of a top team from the US Army.

George Webb: “Why was no record of US performance recorded? Many of the athletes did not attend the events, either because of illness or because they flew all the way to China, and then decided not to compete.” There is information that many of them stayed at Wuhan’s fish market and that 41 hotel employees were also allegedly infected with COVID-19 after the US stayed at the hotel.

French gold medalist Elodie Clouvel says; she got the virus at the Wuhan Military Games in October 2019, and that Clouvel’s boyfriend Valentin also got the coronavirus at the tournament.

Two French athletes say they got CoronaVirus at Wuhan Military Games

According to the Spanish Ministry of Defense, 170 athletes lined up for the games and none of them were tested for coronavirus. According to sources from the ministry who have spoken to EL Mundo, two athletes showed flu-like symptoms during the games in October and two others showed symptoms subsequently, upon returning to Spain.

One of the athletes told El Mundo: “The authorities took it as a sore throat or flu infection, and they treated us like we were already healed .. it was very bad ..”

118 athletes from the Swedish Armed Forces participated in the Wuhan Military Games and stayed in the city for two weeks.

Several competitors became ill, according to which Sweden’s state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell stated that; “It is likely that some people were infected with the coronavirus in Sweden as early as November 2019. There was no spread of infection outside Wuhan, until we saw it in Europe later.”

64 athletes from the Danish Army took part in the World Games in China, it is not known if some have fallen ill.